Subscribe

Posts Tagged ‘Producer’

0

Plugin Review for the Bedroom Producer

Monday, November 23, 2009
posted by davtron

Producing your own tunes in your bedroom on a computer has never been so popular, so with that in mind, SoundFreak is bringing you a review of some current plugins to enable you get better results from your set-up.

Most computer music programmes come with a host of powerful synths, effects units and sequencers that enable the bedroom producer to produce professional sounding music using that package alone. But there are lots of additional instruments and effects out there that you can use to build your virtual studio, providing new sources of sound and inspiration. Vintage synthesizers, virtual analogue compressors, glitchy effects units and classic instrument emulators are amongst the many kinds of plugins that you can add to your library. Before purchasing any additional plugins that take your fancy, I would strongly recommend trying their demo versions first. Here are just a few of my current favourites, all of which are available for both Mac and Windows.

Sampletron

“Tron” instruments first appeared on the commercial market in the 1950’s, and peaked with the Melotron 400 in the 1970’s. You will have heard their use on many famous recordings, the most famous example being the opening few bars on the Beatles Strawberry Fields. This is the classic tron flute, which is still being used by many artists today, over a wide range of genres. Tron instruments are rare and in extremely high demand, so will be in the price range of only the most die hard enthusiasts. But now IK Multimedia and Sonic Reality have created the Sampletron, which combines authentic sounds such as Mellotrons, Chamberlins, and Optigans with its powerful SampleTank engine which will allow you to sonically take these instruments into worlds they have not seen.

The Sampletron comes with over 600 presets from 17 rare and vintage Mellotrons providing a superb edition to any music producers library. You can then time stretch, resample, pitch shift and add effects (chorus, flange, phase, distortion), giving you further options on its sound design that simply weren’t possible with the original instruments.

With over 7Gb of samples that go with it, including drum and musical loops, it is possible to create a full tune using this plugin alone. It is a multimbral instrument, meaning that you assign a different MIDI channel on your DAW to each of the 16 channels of the Sampletron. You can then split your keyboard with the different sounds or layer them on top of each other using their intuitive interface.

The authentic sounds it is capable of producing are extremely impressive. You can hear the tape hissing, and even the odd bummed note on some of the instruments, but this is what gives the tron instruments their character. From film scoring, to hip hop and electronica, this plugin is a must for those looking to add some vintage sounds to their productions. The Sampletron can be purchased online for around £164.

Minimonsta

This virtual vintage keyboard is an emulation of the Minimoog (an analogue synthesizer produced between 1971 and 1982), but with a few additional features that make it a much more powerful synth. If you are looking for that classic analogue synth sound, I can’t recommend this plugin enough. Artists such as Herbie Hancock, Air and Bootsy Collins all used the original Minimoog in their music. This plugin does a great job of emulating the warm sound of that classic synth, and the numerous presets that it includes show off the sounds that this is capable of. Here you can select the original Minimoog patches, as well as some great bass, lead and poly sounds. There is even a selection of Rick Wakeman patches for you to choose from, if that’s what you’re after.

It has all the usual features and more that you would find on the Minimoog – 3 oscillators, a filter and mixer section, LFOs, 10 waveforms to choose from, as well as envelopes and a delay function. They are laid out in the same way as the original, making it easy and intuitive to use once you have a basic understanding of analogue synthesis. But G Force have taken this Minimoog emulator even further, giving the user the option to create sounds that were not possible with the original. You can assign a separate LFO and envelope to almost any of its parameters with just a few clicks of a mouse, allowing you to take your sound design a step further. All the settings can be assigned to a MIDI controller giving you complete control over its sound. The Minimoog became a hugely popular synth not only because of the great sounds that it can produce, but also because of its simple layout, which was easy to understand, and it shaped the way future synths have been designed. The Minimonsta has retained this simple and intuitive layout, but thrown in some extra features, making it a beast of a synth, and one that is practically limitless when it comes to virtual analogue sound design. No wonder their creators describe it as a Minimoog emulator on steroids. The Minimonsta by G Force can be purchased for around £100 incl VAT online.

Automaton

Audiodamage have produced a number of effects plugins, which are great for the dance or experimental music producer who is looking to add that glitchy effect to their music. Their Automaton is my particular favourite. This is a tough effects plugin to describe, as it is based on a mathematical construction called cellular automaton, but the result is an effects processor that harnesses a mixture of chaos and predictability into your music. The principle behind this plugin involves a grid of cells that are in one of two states – dead or alive – and which change in population depending on the rules that you apply. These cells evolve in synch to your host DAW, and trigger effects such as stuttering, bitcrushing, modulation and replicating. The result produces effects patterns that form and dissolve, turn to chaos and back to order, and are constantly evolving.

For stuttering, glitchy beats, I have found this a particularly useful effects unit. By simply inserting this plugin to your drum track, and going through some of the presets, you will see what great constantly evolving effects you can get. Although you may enjoy its unpredictability, it is possible to have more control over when the effects are triggered, using its sequencer. What I love about this is its uniqueness, and the way it can be used subtly in triggering an extra hihat for example, or you can take it to the extreme and generate random IDM madness. You can pick up the Automaton for $49 dollars from the Audiodamage website.

PSP Vintage Warmer 2

This is a high quality digital simulation of an analogue style single/multiband compressor/limiter. If you are looking to add warmth to your recordings with the saturation effect you would expect when recording to tape, I would strongly recommend this plugin. It is also great for finalising a mix and mastering your tracks, and is very easy to use. The presets include those for bass, lead guitar, drum kicks and snare, final mixes and also a mastering first aid setting. Just finding the right preset and tweaking it to your liking can add some real punch to your music. I have always been advised that after you have mixed your track, the mastering should then be done by a professional – a fresh set of ears, and someone who is trained to identify problem frequencies and correct them. But not all bedroom producers can afford to do this, and for me, using the mastering preset on this vintage compressor/limiter and making some fine adjustments can do a pretty convincing job.

The Vintage Warmer has all the usual controls you would expect on an analogue compressor – Attack, Release, Knee control, limiter ceiling and multiband frequency controllers – so if you know your way around a compressor, you will be able to achieve your desired sound easily. This is one of those magical plugins that seems to make it all sound better, even on its default setting and is an invaluable edition to your virtual studio. The PSP Vintage Warmer 2 can be bought online for around $149.

There are thousands of other VST and AU instruments available, offering numerous ways to add some spice and inspiration into your music. If you’re tired of using the same instruments with your computer software then its well worth trying out some third party plugins.

Fayney... mutate and survive!

Fayney... mutate and survive!

Fayney’s best known for instigating 80’s R&B/Rock legend Roachford and working with the Clash but he’s a versatile professional who’s equally happy producing, engineering, writing or doing live sound. His many years in the business are testament to his willingness to adapt and embrace new technologies, attitudes and methods.

SISSY: How would you describe what you do?

FAYNEY: What I do now has expanded from what I thought I’d be doing. Because the necessity in the music business now, is to do more of everything yourself. Like a lot of other people, I’ve been sort of corralled into being hands-on in a lot more areas than just the music, like the business side of things. In the past you might just work on the music and that would be the last you’d see of it until it was on TV; someone else had done the video etc. But now there’s more of a tie in between the different mediums; the audio and video elements have sort of merged along with the business aspect so now I can be called on to do all of it. I think maybe you should ask whether the music side of things is suffering because people have to do so much. The onus has definitely changed now.

I came from a background of people in rooms playing music together and if you wanted to record a track, you had to go into a studio. So it forced more social interaction. Computer technology has given convenience and ease of use but what it’s also done is to actually kill a lot of social interaction.
It’s that image of young kids sat in a room playing video games by themselves, no friends around and totally immersed in it in solitude. Humans are supposed to interact and learn from each other but unfortunately, that same scenario is happening with music.

SISSY: So making music has become much more technical, rather than being based on the vibe… the sounds have to be perfect instead of it being about keeping the take with the best vibe, which might be technically flawed.

FAYNEY: Exactly.

SISSY: How did you get involved in music?

FAYNEY: I always knew from the age of 8 or 9 that I was going to do something with music. I don’t know if it’s like that for everyone; I think sometimes people realise later in life, but from the age of 10, I was already fixing radios and had a working knowledge of electronics. I lived out in the country where there was no access to music, but my family moved to London when I was about 11, which was fortunate, otherwise I might have gone mad from the lack of stimulus.

SISSY: Did you play any instruments?

FAYNEY: Not at the time. My Dad played piano and my Mum played a bit… there was always music in the family. My dad was religious in one sense; he would drag me into the living room; we were a typical West Indian family in that no-one ever went in there except for weddings and funerals, everything was covered in plastic! My dad would take me in there and bombard me with Ray Charles and stuff. I hated it because as a really young kid, I didn’t really understand where that music was coming from. So it wasn’t until later, around 15 or 16 I kind of woke up one day and thought, ‘ah, now I get it’.

SISSY: When did you start working with music?

FAYNEY: I went to university to study electronics and when I was there I met up with a group of guys and formed a college band. I started playing bass at a couple of gigs, but then my interest started to drift. I wasn’t so interested in standing up on a stage in front of people. I actually thought my ego would love it but when I actually got up there and performed, I realised it wasn’t really my thing; it didn’t do it for me.
I wanted to get into the engineering side of things, so I started to look around for jobs in that area.

To start with, I got a job in a hi-fi shop because I couldn’t get a job in a studio; it was the nearest thing I could find. But it just goes to show you that in life, fortune has a big part to play because my sister got talking to a woman who lived on our estate who’s husband was Eddie Grant’s recording engineer. She had mentioned to this woman that I was dying to get into the music business and I couldn’t get a job; I’d sent off loads of applications and hadn’t got any replies.

One day, this woman’s husband knocked on the door. His name was Frank, and he said he could provide me with some training, although he couldn’t offer me any money. I was blown away! So I went to the Coach House studios and I basically sat behind him on studio sessions and just watched what he was doing. Then gradually, they let me take the reins on a few things, like recording the drums or something, and I learnt very gradually. My earliest recollection of recording anything is when Eddy Grant’s old band, the Equals, had come in to record some stuff and I got involved in recording some of that.

SISSY: Was it an easy road from then on?

FAYNEY: No, I ended up being out of work for about a year. When you’re out of work there’s 2 choices; you can either sit around or you can be pro-active, and I’ve always been the latter… god loves a trier! So I just kept knocking on doors and one day this guy who funnily enough was Eddy Grant’s cousin, found me. I’d been asking around for work and told me about a job going at a studio where they needed a young engineer to work for a famous band. He asked if I’d like to come down for an interview at 9am in the morning… well I wasn’t stupid, I was there bright and early!

It was very odd; I walked into this place, which was a well-equipped studio. It was only 8-track but everything was brand new and pristine like nobody had ever used it. There was this short guy in there who was obviously the governor. He introduced himself as Bernie Rhodes, shook my hand and ushered me into the studio, where there was a guy playing guitar, who got up and walked out; I remember thinking later that I should have recognised him. Bernie immediately turned to me… he was a very acidic character but I don’t think he meant it in a bad way, I just think he was always trying to test your mettle because he knew that if you want to survive in this business, you’re going to have to be a bit tough. So he said ‘who are you then, who is this Fayney character?’ I explained that I’d been looking for work in a studio and that I’d had a bit of experience. He asked me how many hits I’d worked on and I had to say there hadn’t been any so far. Then he gave me a tape by a band called the Black Arabs and told me to put it on and do a mix of it for him. By this time, I was shaking, but I put the tape on and managed to get it all working while Bernie went out for a coffee. I did a mix and gave him a cassette of it, then went home, not expecting to hear anything.
Anyway, the next morning the phone rang at 8.30am and when I answered it was Bernie. He said ‘Look, I don’t know how you do things, but where we come from, we start work at 9 o’clock, so you better get your ass down here!’ So I scrambled to get myself together, and went to the studio not really knowing what was going on… I was definitely intrigued to say the least. When I arrived Bernie introduced me to these 4 guys who were there; they were called the Clash and he was their manager.

I was already into the Clash because an old school buddy of mine whose uncle was King Tubby, the legendary Jamaican producer, had he’d told me the Clash had some wicked tunes and that I should check them out. We played London Calling to death at one point. At the time I was mostly listening to reggae and rare groove or soul but when I heard the Clash, it really stood out! I remember 2 months later, I was walking down the road and at the local town hall, there was a punk band playing. I’d never seen a punk before and there were loads of them hanging around. I remember I didn’t feel threatened or anything, but the whole thing was so strange, it was like humanity had changed overnight and no one had warned me!

SISSY: Did you record the Clash?

FAYNEY: I basically ran their studios for them, and the main part I played was when they split up, we had to find replacements for their last album. I did lots of live sound for them as well, which was f****n brilliant; I was only 18 at the time.

SISSY: Would you say the Clash were responsible for expanding your musical taste to include rockier stuff?

FAYNEY: That’s not really true, but what they did get me into was politics. I wouldn’t describe the Clash as being the greatest musicians on earth but their vibe, spirit and political stance were what got to me; I’d never experienced that before. So they opened up a whole new world for me, literally overnight.

SISSY: What happened next?

FAYNEY: The Clash did a lot of stuff overseas and I didn’t go with them to the States, so while I was working at their studio I started doing other things with people involved in the scene. I did the pre-production for Malcom McLaren’s Madame Butterfly album and I worked with Bow Wow Wow, Adam Ant and the Specials.
I mostly did engineering work and contributed ideas here and there.

Things were different in those days; we’d be drinking in a bar somewhere and meet a guitarist or something, then rope them into coming to the studio to record the next day. That’s what I call punk; I don’t think of it as just the music, it’s an attitude and a way of doing things, a lifestyle.

Around that time, I also started doing some of my own music. I wasn’t really a player except for a bit of bass which isn’t much good for writing by yourself. So I persuaded Bernie to get me some equipment; drum machines and synths and stuff. I started working on some ideas and I was looking around for musicians to work with. A friend of mine recommended a guy called Andrew Roachford, so I got him in to play a keyboard part on a track I had. To be honest, he was terrible and I couldn’t wait to see the back of him! About a year later, I got invited to a concert at my friend’s college. I ended up back stage, chatting to people and not really paying attention to the bands when suddenly I heard this guy singing and it grabbed my attention; it was like a bell ringing in my head or something. I went to look and it was that same guy, Andrew Roachford! It turned out that when he’d come to my studio, he’d never played a synthesiser before, only the electric piano, which was why he’d sounded so bad. So I got him to come to the studio again, and we wrote a whole track in one day from start to finish. We didn’t really know what we were doing, it was a vibe thing… we seemed to be able to communicate without even talking and we knew we were onto something. We then started working towards the Roachford that eventually got known.

SISSY: What was your role in Roachford?

FAYNEY: Predominantly, I did arrangement and co-production, as well as suggesting ideas for videos and things.

SISSY: It always seemed that Roachford were very respected by other musicians as well as fans…

FAYNEY: Yes, I remember one time when we did a little gig somewhere and this guy came who ran Michael Jackson’s publishing empire. It turned out Michael wanted to buy our publishing because he was a big fan. Another time, Greg Phillinganes, the musical director of Michael Jackson’s Bad tour came down to some of our rehearsals, and he told us that Michael had come onto their tour bus once on the tour just to give everyone a copy of the Roachford album, and told us all to study it!

SISSY: Why do you think Roachford didn’t maintain their successful position?

FAYNEY: It was a set of circumstances that could have happened to anybody; I think the thing to remember when you’re in the music game is it’s a game of Russian Roulette. And just as you may be prepared to get all the adulation, people throwing their knickers at you and the stuff you get off on, you’ve also got to be prepared for the downfall. It’s no good if you have a fragile ego; if you have an ego you’ve got to leave it on the stage.

With Roachford, we’d been quite successful in the UK and we went to America and had a hit single and album there. But there was a timing issue because while we were messing around doing radio promos in America, we should have been back in the UK recording the next album and keeping the profile up. I remember we did a gig in Germany supporting Steve Miller and he offered us a bit of good advice… whenever you hand over an album to your record company, make sure you have the next one already prepared. It’s hard to do but it’s a must; if the first one takes off you need to back it up quickly.

SISSY: That’s like something I’ve been told before; when you record your first album, you’ve had your whole life to write and perfect it, but you have to make your second one in a few months. That’s why lots of bands flop on their second album.

FAYNEY: Exactly.

SISSY: There was also a bit of an R&B/rock crossover movement going on then… I remember bands like the Brand New Heavies and Living Colour being popular at that time.

FAYNEY: We met Corey Glover, the singer of Living Colour at a backstage party somewhere. His girlfriend said she was a big Roachford fan and he seemed to have a bit of an alpha-male knee jerk reaction; he started slagging us off and saying we shouldn’t do schmaltzy love songs although ironically, their biggest hit was a ballad type watered-down version of their other stuff!

SISSY: What happened after Roachford?

FAYNEY: We kind of drifted apart and started doing our own things. For a while, I started doing some work for Elton John’s manager; live gigs for Elton and Courtney Pine. Elton John was a big fan of Andrew Roachford. I did some big gigs with him in Paris and it was crazy… every night I would be taken from the hotel in a stretch limo to the backstage door, then had to wait until the production girls had spread rose petals on the floor. I had my own room with 5 bottles of the finest chilled champagne and a Michelin chef doing the catering; no menu, he just cooked whatever you ordered!

I got a publishing deal with Trinifold, the company that manage the Who and the remaining members of Led Zeppelin. I also became a DJ at Madame Jo-Jo’s in Soho for a while, playing rare groove. Then I met my production partner, Jamie Maher and we set up our own studio, called Big Fucking Digital, originally with a guy called Martin Eden as well.

SISSY: You seem to do different jobs for people; can you tell us a bit about that?

FAYNEY: We’ve done bits of film music, including lots of post production for ‘I’ll Be There’ starring Charlotte Church. The good thing about being established is that people know what you’re about so they know they can trust you to do a job when they need something doing. The funny thing is, because the music business has taken such a strange turn, a lot of high-end producers who were doing really good business a couple of years ago, are having to sell of bits of equipment now. It’s got that bad for a lot of people. The reason Jamie and I are hanging in there is because we’re more versatile, and a small, flexible company. Lately we’ve done a few tracks for New Order’s last album and we did a wicked remix with Arthur Baker for Ash, called Submission.

Jamie and I like all kinds of music and we try and put that feel into everything we do, so it’s easy for us to switch hats and do a dance track or rock or anything. We actually ended up working on the Ukranian eurovision entry in 2004, which won! Our management company were approached by these people looking for a production and co-writing team to work on a couple of tracks. So we agreed a fee and they came into the studio to play us the ideas, and told us they wanted to put the track in the eurovision song contest. They weren’t concerned about winning, they just wanted to get some exposure for this girl Roslana’s album. We re-wrote it with them because the original was some gibberish about the local goat’s cheese and their favourite meat! Then it accidently won, which was slightly embarrassing but funny at the same time!

SISSY: What software are you into using?

FAYNEY: Jamie and I use Pro-Tools, but we’ve been waiting for Apple to bring out their own hardware in conjunction with a company called Apergy, which is set to rival Pro-Tools and will be a lot cheaper. It works through the system in Apple called Core Audio; it will make it even easier to get good results on a home system. The interface will give you much more power and creative potential. But at the end of the day, I’m an analogue engineer. The last analogue album I did was in New York; we recorded onto tape in this lovely wood room. When I got back to England, I did transfer it to digital but I used a system called Radar because it’s the only digital system that sounds like tape… it doesn’t steal your soul!

SISSY: That’s what people used to say about the first digital mixing system called SSL, which everyone used in the 80’s… it’s almost as though that was the sound of the 80’s.

FAYNEY: Totally; the first Roachford album mixes were done on SSL and I was horrified. It sounded so harsh and aggressive, like that clinical Art of Noise/Frankie Goes to Hollywood sound. I think software like Logic and Pro-Tools do the same thing to a lesser extent, but I couldn’t tell the difference between Radar and tape. I think you can have the best of both worlds, like using an old console that’s driven digitally. But you have to pay attention to what you’re using; if you want a really warm sound, you won’t get it without using valves… a plug-in just won’t do the job that a valve amp would. But there are pros and cons to the way things are going; it’s good you can get a laptop and do things through the internet, but go out to gigs as well and converse with people. Try and find musicians you can get a vibe with and then try and capture that on your recordings. You have to try and give more with the vibe now, because the machines give you less.

SISSY: What are your plans for the future?

FAYNEY: I’ve got a prediction for you for the future… because of the way that reality TV is going, picture this; one day you’ll turn on your TV and on the screen you’ll see yourself, sitting there watching the TV. And then they’ll find a way to make you pay for it! But seriously, now we’re trying to set up an internet label; people are starting to realise that there are viable ways of making money from music through the internet instead of the typical label approach. We’re working with a couple of bands at the moment called the London Beach and The Dirty Feel, with a view to releasing their stuff on the internet. Bands can put a tune on lots of different internet sites instead of being tied to one label like they were in the past. And those record deals were on really shit terms. So I would say to any young musician now, forget the major labels. If you have an album recorded and ready to go, do it yourself through the internet.

SISSY: So instead of trying to get an A&R man into you, you’re better off trying to find your own computer geek to be like an extra band member!

FAYNEY: Yes, you need to find people who can help build you a website. Try finding someone who’s at Art College or something, who wants some real world experience. What we’re trying to do is different from the traditional record company approach; we want to create a level playing field and facilitate the need for growth; encourage enterprise. If there’s too much financial pressure on a band when they record, they’ll blow it and not get another chance, which is what happens on major labels. We want to put out music on a song-by-song basis where the band isn’t signing their life away. If you don’t put some mud down, the plants won’t grow; the record companies aren’t allowing things to develop any more, they just want singles. The whole record company thing is dead… they just don’t know it yet! For the first time, people can now control their digital identity. In the same way that you don’t need to go to the bank, you also no longer need a record company because you can do it all online. The record companies could save themselves but they’re not willing to give up their greed! Ultimately, music will probably be free but that will generate income from other parts of your identity; merchandising, tickets for gigs, access to tour diaries on line etc.

SISSY: You have your own album under the name ‘the Rainmaker’. Can you tell us about that?

FAYNEY: I’ve basically spent 5 years making this album, not because it’s immaculately played or recorded; in fact I’ve tried to make it as lo-fi as possible… I recorded everything at 16-bit. I took a long time making it because it’s a heartfelt album; it’s not instantaneous, it’s a grower! I’m about to release the album online; it’ll be available on 35 different music websites, details of which will be at myspace.com/therainmakeruk.

……………

Since doing this interview with Fayney, he and his partner Jamie Maher have been producing an album with young Icelandic singer Vedis Hervor Amadottir. They’re flying out to Iceland in a couple of weeks to finish recording.

Dimitri with members of Trash Palace... he's so french!

Dimitri with members of Trash Palace... he's so french!

Producer/programmer Dimitri Tikovoi grew up in Paris where his parents are both luminaries in the French theatre scene. Since moving to the UK he’s produced and/or done programming for Placebo, The Raveonettes, Goldfrapp, Future Sound of London, Marc Almond, Gary Numan and John Cale to name but a few. Dimitri also recorded his own album under the name Trash Palace and toured to promote the material with a live band. The album featured guest vocals from Brian Molko (Placebo), Alison Shaw (Cranes), John Cale (the Velvet Underground), Asia Argenta (the Italian actress and director), Cozette, and Lian Warmington. Sissy was fortunate enough to get an invite to visit Dimitri in the studio where he was producing the new Placebo album… We got to hear a snippet of a couple of new songs from the album ‘MEDS’ before it was released, and approved of the fact that the flavour was distinctly vintage gothic Placebo!

SISSY: Why did you choose a career in music rather than following your parents into the theatre?

DIMITRI: I hated theatre, being born around theatre people meant I had too much of it and I suppose music was my way of rebelling. I started playing drums when I was 7, I went to drum school and studied percussion at the Conservatory of Classical Music, and I studied Jazz at CIM, the Institute of Contemporary Music in Paris

SISSY: How did you get into production?

DIMITRI: By playing with bands and recording them in my little studio at home on a four-track recorder, writing songs and someone would hear it and say ‘can you do something with me?’ then little by little things fell into place… I bought an 8-track and slowly learnt more.

SISSY: Can you give any advice on recording at a basic level?

DIMITRI: Just read sound magazines, and if you go into a proper studio, watch everything that’s done, ask lots of questions.

SISSY: When did you get into computer recording rather than tape machines?

DIMITRI: The first thing I bought as soon as I earned some money was an Atari computer with Cubase so I started working with that, but at the time it was very basic, all midi stuff with synthesisers. At the same time I had a musician’s background, mainly rock and jazz. It started to become possible to combine the two in terms of recording, not just midi around ‘95, ‘96. The first direct to disk recorder was an Akai 8-track and that’s the first time I recorded things like vocals on a computer because it was much more convenient especially for vocal comps and editing. After that pro-tools had just come out and I started using Session 8 which was the early version.

SISSY: What made you move to the UK?

DIMITRI: The music; France is not much of a country for live music, here there are lots of pubs and clubs where you can play and learn to be good but in France there’s nothing in between someone playing accordion in the town hall and big venues for bands that are already established. There aren’t enough venues for live music so there aren’t many touring rock bands… if you’re a young band in France it’s really hard. Also French bands often try to copy what’s coming from England or America so it’s not very original, just a bad version of the same thing.

SISSY: Can you offer any advice to French bands on how to get round this?

DIMITRI: French music has developed since I left…

SISSY: Is that because you left?!

DIMITRI: Yeah, once they got rid of me everything was fine! No its just that they’ve developed in terms of the fact that electronic music is now really strong in France for exactly the reason I mentioned; that there aren’t any places to play so there’s a whole generation of young people that want to do music and they’ve found an alternative way to do it.
When you can’t learn to be a good band by playing live, you’re going to find another way to do it and home studios and electronic equipment are available to everyone.

SISSY: Do you identify yourself with the ‘French sound’ typified by Daft Punk and Mirwais?

DIMITRI: No, but I like some of it. It’s very retro or maybe a combination of retro with a kind of ‘cheese factor’. The French electronic scene is really influenced by disco and the dance scene whereas I came from a rock and jazz background. I always programmed, but I like much more aggressive stuff like Nine Inch Nails and there’s a huge difference between them and something like Daft Punk.

SISSY: You’re producing the Placebo album and Flood is mixing… Isn’t that a reversal of your usual roles?

DIMITRI: Kind of… I do a lot of work with Flood. I started off doing some programming and playing on stuff for him, like Gary Numan and various things then we started co-producing. With the Placebo album I was telling him that I was going to produce it. He said that if I needed someone to mix, he’d be very happy to do it which was great as I didn’t think he’d want to; because I know that the band asked him before and he’d never been available so I wasn’t sure if he liked their music.

SISSY: How would you describe the sound of the new Placebo album?

DIMITRI: Very dark and raw; they’ve done a lot of evolving in the past so because it’s the fifth album, I thought it would be good to take it back to something a bit more raw and basic, the essence of what Placebo was originally about. I wanted to push them to go back to playing guitars instead of having loads of programming. Which is funny because at the start they got me in to do some programming!

SISSY: Did that come as a surprise to the band?

DIMITRI: Well it’s a relationship that develops… it doesn’t happen instantly in one moment. I’m not addicted to power so I’m quite a discreet dictator in the studio! But to be serious, we have a good working relationship so I did have it in my mind to go back to something more raw and it’s just about getting them to try it and if they like it we go with it and if they don’t, we change it. But the more I encouraged them to go back to basic guitars, the more they enjoyed it and thought it was great and realised that’s where they came from. Everything fell into place.

SISSY: How did you get to know Placebo?

DIMITRI: It was through Rob Ellis who plays for PJ Harvey, because we had the same manager at the time and Rob was asked to do a string arrangement on one track. He was struggling a bit so I offered to let him come to my home studio and demo the strings and they really liked it so instead of getting some string players, they asked me to come to the studio with some samples and used what I had done.

SISSY: Is it a good thing to work with friends or can it cause problems?

DIMITRI: It could go both ways, but if you’re going to spend 6 months in the studio with someone, you will either become friends or you will hate each other! I don’t think it’s changed much with Placebo because we respect each other.

SISSY: What prompted you to start Trash Palace (Dimitri’s own project which released an album and gigged as a live band)?

DIMITRI: When I moved to London I didn’t have much work to start with so when you don’t have any work you start doing things by yourself. I find it very hard to do things completely by myself because you don’t have any mirror or feedback from anywhere; one minute you can love something and the next minute you can absolutely hate it because there’s no-one to help you be objective. It took me a long time but it was a good learning experience. I’d like to try and do another album but we’ll see…

SISSY: Did you have a cohesive vision for the project from the start or did it evolve?

DIMITRI: I just wanted to push myself, my own knowledge of computer-based music so there was a lot of experimentation and trying to do things a bit differently. But I also had a theme which was sex, because firstly, everyone uses sex to sell things but they exploit it in a way that’s not very sensual or erotic. I thought that if I could combine some kind of eroticism into something that is as cold as electronic music, then it would be really interesting. Also I wanted things to be a bit deranged or slightly out of place…kind of the opposite of Britney Spears! Electronic music is so cold because it’s made with machines so if you try to put sensuality into it, it kind of gives it some soul.

SISSY: Your stage shows were quite theatrical. Was that influenced by your theatre background?

DIMITRI: It was difficult because I think I think electronic music on stage can be really boring. I haven’t seen many people, including Trash Palace that have succeeded in doing it. The problem with Trash Palace was that the album had lots of guest singers so there was no actual lead singer. It’s hard to have a band unity because lots of the music is coming from machines so the band are just recreating or doubling what the machines are doing. It’s very tricky to get it right on stage.

SISSY: Sometimes electronic music is best played by a DJ through an appropriate sound system…

DIMITRI: Well it’s basically studio music; I never planned to do it live when I was recording the album. But at some point you have to. I though it would be good fun and I had grand ideas about ways of doing it; sometimes you can pull it off and it’s fun but sometimes you can’t do it right because you don’t have the budget or if you’re playing smaller rock venues it doesn’t work because it’s not a real rock band so you try and compensate with theatrics or lighting and video displays.

SISSY: How was Trash Palace received?

DIMITRI: It was great; the first show we did was the Routes de Rock in France to 15,000 people. A lot of the guest singers did that gig as well, which made a big difference. Some people absolutely hated it and some people really loved it so it generated some kind of war in the French media, which makes great publicity. At least if someone hates it then you’ve provoked a strong reaction; some people saw the humour in it and some didn’t. I enjoyed it though!

SISSY: Do you think you’ll ever make another album of your own?

DIMITRI: I don’t know; I’d like to try again but this time I’d need a bit more of a focus and maybe do it with someone who’s going to front it and be the lead singer. It’s also about finding the right space in your mind… I really like producing because I like working with other people so much so I’d have to be in the right mood to do things on my own. Although the idea of doing another album is exciting, the reality of being by myself trying to make music is less exciting!

SISSY: Do you like the attention of being in the spotlight as a performer or do you prefer to be behind the scenes?

DIMITRI: Both of them are great; it’s good fun to be the centre of attention! But I like being behind the scenes too although it’s very different.

SISSY: After you finished promoting the Trash Palace album I got the impression you’d had enough of touring and thought that all musicians were bastards!

DIMITRI: They are! No really it’s just that I don’t know if I can cope with endless touring. I like being on stage and playing but the studio is a more creative environment. Being on stage and touring is not. You just play stuff and it’s good fun but it’s a different energy. And I start to miss the creative energy very quickly. I used to tour as a drummer when I was very young and after a month of touring I was ready to go home. So touring to promote an album for two years is for me, a nightmare.

SISSY: Do you think the creative buzz is more enduring whereas the live buzz is like a drug, a quick hit like amyl nitrate or something?!

DIMITRI: Yes, it’s a brilliant hit; it boosts you up and there’s nothing like it but it ends up being too repetitive when you do it day after day and you’re not going anywhere creatively. I like exploring and experimenting, finding new things and learning so I prefer the studio environment for those things.

WAREZ: What’s your opinion on the impact of the internet and filesharing on the music industry?

DIMITRI: I think it’s great. I don’t condemn people who download music illegally because it’s not being done by people that have money and can afford to buy CD’s. You’re not going to spend 45 minutes downloading something that might sound shit and have half the song missing if you can go and buy the CD. So the people that do it are usually kids that can’t afford to buy things and the good thing is they’re discovering music and bands that they wouldn’t hear otherwise. Therefore they listen to new music and by doing that, maybe they’ll get to really like a band and go buy the CD because they want to have the artwork. And they’re more likely to go and see the band live because you can’t download that experience! I think that the internet has done live music a great favour because more people are getting to know about more and more bands so they’re going to more gigs. So I think it’s a good thing and in terms of Madonna being downloaded and only selling 25 million instead of 26, then ok, the majors might lose a small percentage of their sales but I think the impact for artists is not a bad one at all.

SISSY: Do you remember the first big gig you went to and what your early influences were?

DIMITRI: The first proper gig I saw was David Bowie. The Velvet Underground would be another big influence because everything they did should have been completely wrong and it shouldn’t have worked but for some weird reason it did!
It held together by the skin of its teeth. If it was one track you could say it happened by accident but because it was a whole album, you realise it was pure genius. They couldn’t play, they couldn’t sing, they couldn’t write songs in a conventional technical way but somehow they actually could in a very different way. So it wasn’t about the technical ability, it was about the emotion that’s in the music. Prince was also an absolute genius, probably the biggest genius of the 1980’s and an influence on me because he produced his own material and other artists as well.

SISSY: Can you recommend any equipment for recording?

DIMITRI: At the moment I really like the Shure Beta 58 microphone. We’ve used it for all Brian’s vocals on the Placebo album and for some of the drums and guitars. I love this mic… it’s one of the cheapest good ones you can get (about £50 more than an SM 58) and it always sounds great. For guitars, if you want a really modern sound, plug-ins like Guitar Rig are really good. But you can’t beat Marshall, Fender Twin and Vox for real amp sounds. A good thing to do is to split the guitar signal and record two different amps at the same time. There’s lots of good software; Pro Tools, Logic, Cubase, Reason, Live or even GarageBand, it’s about learning how to use it and getting it to do something it’s not supposed to do. If you use all the presets in GarageBand you’ll end up with all the same sounds as someone else but if you experiment you can get something good with it. It’s not necessarily about the equipment you use; it’s more about how you use it!

…………………….

Just then, Brian Molko appears in the studio to listen to mixes, tired after a day’s photo shoot. Sissy asks Brian why Placebo are such workaholics… they never seem to stop writing, recording and touring in an endless cycle! Brian feigns an air of worldweary cynicism and replies ‘It’s because our lives are so unsatisfactory that we have to throw ourselves into work and booze in order to stay alive!’ We think we can detect an ironic twinkle in his eye when he says it; we certainly hope so!

0

Flood – Pro-Active Producer

Wednesday, March 29, 2006
posted by Sissy Manolo

Flood… crazy about tape!

Flood has been a legendary producer for the best part of two decades; he’s mixed or produced countless credible acts including New Order, The Smashing Pumpkins, Tricky, PJ Harvey, U2, Nick Cave, Depeche Mode, Nine Inch Nails, and Tom Jones. His early engineering credits include the Jesus & Mary Chain and Soft Cell. Sissy was lucky enough to meet Flood as he was mixing the new Placebo album (with producer Dimitri Tikovoi) and he was happy to answer a few questions…

SISSY: I’d be interested to know how you got started in the music industry and what led to the path you’ve taken?

FLOOD: Well I started off playing in punk bands and running my own ‘disco’ as it was called then, around 1976, 77. We played small places outside London; I was still at school while I was doing that.

SISSY: Did you get anything released?

FLOOD: We tried! We nearly got one single released… we did it ourselves and then it went to Eddy Grant’s pressing plant which went bust while our master tapes were in there so it never saw the light of day.

SISSY: People would probably pay good money to hear that if it turned up somewhere now!

FLOOD: Hopefully they’ve destroyed all the evidence!

SISSY: What instrument did you play?

FLOOD: Guitar… very badly, which was ok because it was a punk band. We were called Seven Hertz.

SISSY: That’s quite high tech for 1976… and kind of prophetic of your later career in a way?

FLOOD: Yes; it’s a little bit worrying actually!

SISSY: What prompted the transition from playing in bands to producing?

FLOOD: I’d got really bored at school and I’d been reading all those magazines like International Musician. There was a big long article about recording studios and one section was about what was involved in being a tea boy/tape op at a recoding studio, written from a perspective of trying to put people off. But when I read it, it made me think… Wow! I’ve got to do this. So I went to the careers master at school and said ‘I want to work in a recording studio’ and he said ‘Err, I don’t really know what that is, so just stick to whatever you’re supposed to be doing’. Then I pretty much ignored everybody and did my own thing; I completely flunked all my exams, which then gave me the excuse to pursue my own direction.I phoned up about 40 studios and asked if they had any jobs for tea boys. I got an interview and three days later I was working.

SISSY: Which studio was that?… Does it still exist?

FLOOD: It was originally called Morgan Studios which later metamorphosised into the Power Plant and then became Battery Studios. I started there in 1978.

SISSY: What sort of bands did you see come through the doors while you were working there?

FLOOD: Well the first week, there was Black Sabbath, Thin Lizzy, another heavy metal band called Money and Jack Bruce (from the band Cream) was in doing some solo stuff.

SISSY: Cool! So you learned your skills working on the best stuff. Did they train you as you went along or did you just have to learn by observing, looking over the shoulder of the engineer?

FLOOD: At that place there were four studios with 6 or 7 in-house engineers, 10 assistants and four runners or tea boys of which I was one. So when I was on the day shift I never even saw the studio because I was doing all the menial tasks but on night shifts I got to sit in on the sessions and assistants would take me under their wing. Slowly, you’d build up to learning enough to do your first job.

SISSY: What do you think of the fact that to some extent, that whole thing has declined now that there’s less call for old-style recording studios because everyone has access to cheap, good quality home-recording set-ups? Do you think it’s a bad thing that there are fewer opportunities for people to train up and learn their skills?

FLOOD: I think it’s a shame because there’s experience that people can pass on and lots of that knowledge is being lost.

SISSY: How long did it take before you were recording things yourself?

FLOOD: I worked at the first place for about two and a half years and I graduated to being an assistant, then moved to another studio where it was all film soundtracks and adverts. Then I got another job as an assistant engineer and worked my way up to being an engineer over the course of about 6 years.

SISSY: So you had a long apprenticeship and really got to know your stuff?

FLOOD: Absolutely, it was invaluable.

SISSY: What do you think is the main cause of changing the old way of doing things?

FLOOD: Computers and digital technology. It doesn’t matter whether you’re talking about photography, music or art or even in the book world; it’s the same thing. I’ve talked to lots of people and what seems to happen is, in the beginning with new technology, you have this massive thing where suddenly anyone can do it, almost going back to the punk ideal which is really good, but then the longevity starts to suffer so you find bands getting stuck after they’ve made their first great album and they can’t move on. Because it’s not just about having all the gadgetry, it’s also about having the experience to be able to work and interact with people and about knowing how to get results when it isn’t all going smoothly; the discipline of how to do things.

SISSY: Do you think that in the same way, the Punk movement could have been responsible for making record companies think that you didn’t need real musical talent as long as you had an attitude and a marketing angle, paving the way for more manufactured acts?

FLOOD: Possibly, although I think that’s more to do with the late 80’s and early 90’s when there was a boom in the marketing and PR side of things. When people ask me what I do, I say I make music to be bought, not sold! Because on one hand, you’re crazy if you think you’re just making art; it is ultimately a commodity but on the other hand the music has to be good and should create its own demand.

SISSY: Do you have principles on what type of artist you’ll work with, based on that?

FLOOD: It’s whatever I’m interested by but I seem to weed it out by meeting people or events pointing things out to me. I can’t do anything just for the money, there has to be something artistic or emotional about it. The music has to move me and I’ve got to get on with the people. If you then accidentally make something that sells shed loads then great!

SISSY: Have you been asked by record companies to basically ‘polish a turd’ and use your reputation to help sell something?

FLOOD: Yes; on numerous occasions but I just turn it down. I’m lucky enough to be in a position where I’m able to do that.

SISSY: Now that there are less opportunities to train in a recoding studio, what do you recommend as the best way to learn to engineer and produce?

FLOOD: It’s very difficult. And things are still changing at the moment, which makes it even more difficult. There’s only about half a dozen multi-studio complexes left in London. But what’s starting to happen is a lot of the old multi-studios are re-opening where there’s say 4 studios and they’re all separately owned. So one way of doing it is to try and apply for a job at one of those.
A good thing to do is to get together with a couple of like-minded people and try and do something yourselves. You don’t have to have all the bells and whistles on to start; experience is essential in the long term but to get the ball rolling all you need is naivety, passion and a desire to explore. If you say you want to go into it to make loads of money then get an admin job at a record company or publishing company! But if you’re doing it because you love music and want to learn, if for example you’re somebody who’s more into programming then hook up with someone who’s a great musician so you can cover all the bases. You can start doing that in your bedroom on your computer.
I know that now you can go to college and do a course in production or sound engineering so that’s another way… I’ve taught in a couple of colleges, mainly in Ireland and it’s a great idea but there really is no substitute for experience… you can’t describe to anyone what it feels like and what you’re thinking about or all the different situations that arise that you should be able to take care of.

SISSY: In your own studio you have lots of vintage equipment as well as state of the art computer and digital stuff. Do you prefer one to the other?

FLOOD: It’s strange; I like both extremes for different purposes. All the vintage stuff there is old synths, which have great sounds. But I love high-end digital effects so my whole thing is based on flip-flopping between old and new and getting the best of both worlds.In the last ten years we’ve had this ‘old is bad, new is good’ attitude and it’s only now that people are starting to realise, there might have been a reason why something worked its way through for 30 years and why people were doing it like that.

SISSY: Which software programme do you think is best?

FLOOD: To be honest, I’d much rather have a tape machine!

SISSY: Do you believe that tape has a better intrinsic sound?

FLOOD: Yes, but also for me the most important thing is the psychology that goes behind it… I could do a whole interview on that subject! Briefly, its because you make decisions instead of leaving everything till the mix so your options are more limited about what you can do. Sometimes the more limits you have, the greater your creativity.

SISSY: As in necessity is the mother of invention!

FLOOD: Absolutely; for example if you’ve got one microphone and one amplifier you can still make an album but you’ll have to try harder to use your creativity than if you’re in a huge studio with endless possibilities.Limitations can make you more disciplined and you won’t spend so much time concentrating on small sections, you’d be listening to the whole. Also because there was no ‘undo’ function, everyone involved had more responsibility, like if the little tape-op sitting in the corner screws up on a punch… nerve-wracking experiences like having to drop in a 100-piece orchestra 2 minutes before they go into £10,000 worth of overtime! It promoted team spirit and more of a sense of focus… the music was really important. If you were faffing around or not really paying attention you’d get caught short. And good mistakes can happen with tape that will end up being kept because they’re better than the original idea.

SISSY: Having said all that, when you have to use a computer, what do you think is the best programme?

FLOOD: From an engineer’s point of view, Pro Tools is probably the best. It’s one of the main industry standards now and if you want to learn quickly go to Digidesign.com and you can download a free 8-track version of it. It’s a very cut back version but the basic principles are there.

SISSY: Do you have any other favourite bits of kit that you can recommend?

FLOOD: My favourite microphone is the Shure Beta 58. There hasn’t been a vocalist in the last 15 years from Bono to Polly Harvey that hasn’t recorded with a Beta 58.People say ‘how did you get that amazing vocal sound’ and it’s just that microphone which is affordable but sounds great.

SISSY: What speakers do you like to have for monitoring?

FLOOD: Speakers are very much a matter of personal taste but at the moment we’re listening to things through a little Panasonic ghetto-blaster; we call it ‘the box of truth’… if it sounds good on that it’ll sound good on anything! What you’re trying to do is to give the same feeling from a track through every different set of speakers so it’s a good idea to check your mix on lots of different systems.

SISSY: What’s the first big gig you went to see?

FLOOD: It was pretty weird actually, my first ever gig was Tangerine Dream.

SISSY: They’re quite influential now aren’t they?… it’s almost like you’ve come full circle! What were your other early influences?

FLOOD: Before punk I was a total pop head; I loved T Rex, Bowie, all the glam bands. And because of my friend’s older brothers and mine we got into prog rock stuff like Tangerine Dream and Yes. Then when I was about 13 somebody sold me this dodgy compilation and on it was this one track that stood out like a sore thumb… it was Search and Destroy by Iggy Pop so I started to go in that direction; the MC5 and all the godfathers of punk. When punk actually arrived, I was ready and waiting!

SISSY: Are there any acts around at the moment that you particularly like?

FLOOD: For me 2005 has been an inspiring year because I love emotion and passion to come through in the music but I also love great pop. So bands like Arcade Fire, Kaiser Chiefs, Hard Fi, I really like them, it’s great when bands like these are getting in the top twenty.

SISSY: Have you got anything lined up in the near future?

FLOOD: In 2006 I’m going to be producing the Killers with Alan Moulder.

SISSY: Do you think the internet has had a damaging effect on the industry?

FLOOD: No; my personal opinion is I blame CD’s. I think they are one of the things that are killing music! It’s the way they sound, the fact that they look so trivial, so small and they’ve changed people’s music habits. Like you’d never listen to 70 minutes of music any more… everyone’s attention span is so short because you can flick through an entire album and dismiss it based on having listened to 30 seconds of music.Downloads, I think are brilliant because it encourages people to be pro-active and you physically have to download it. Whether it’s peer-to-peer or a commercial site doesn’t matter. Also you can check out a band; download a track for 79p or something whereas if you went to a record shop and you’re looking at a CD thinking it’s going to cost £15, you’re not going to take a chance on it. So the internet encourages people to listen to new stuff… if you think the first track is good, you’ll buy another one.

SISSY: In what ways do you think the industry is changing?

FLOOD: I think everything will settle down eventually. At the moment the majors aren’t developing any artists and they’re starting to find out that you can’t do that or you end up with no new bands. At the moment, a lot of producers and small production companies are acting as development agencies. Myself, my manager and Dimitri Tikovoi have been working with a singer called Tigs for 2 years and it’s only recently that she got signed after we’d already made the whole album. So maybe that’s how things will be in the future, or maybe the record companies will start to develop bands again… I hope so!

……………………

That’s where we leave Flood to finish mixing the forthcoming Placebo album; as we leave we bemoan with him the demise of the great british intelligent novelty pop single in the vein of the Timelord’s ‘Doctor Who’ or Frankie’s ‘Relax’. Flood agrees that it’s essential that we shouldn’t forget the fun element, and that one of the most important things is to just enjoy making the music!